裸体午餐

Nothing is true ,everything is permitted .Hassan Sabbah. 天下无真,万世可行

   Hustlers of the world ,
  There is one Mark u cannot beat.
  The Mark inside…
  William .S Burroughs.
  女人的脸,白,惨白.
  人的长相都极其的怪异
   整个画面像是旧世纪,暗,但这又不是颜色或是光线的问题,更接近一种本质,混淆在一起的杂物,沉淀,像是水中长满咯青苔,时间久远后蜕变成灰墨色,接近于大地的一种色调.
  虫,以为是某种类似ET的电影,腐肉,像内脏一样的嘴巴,褶皱的嘴巴突兀地说着话,不着边际,又似在影射一种具体,来自精神,源于生活.卡夫卡式的迷幻,让我想起以前用作页面顶置的一幅图,交错似迷宫的门,一扇扇在前方开着的门,潦倒的背影.
  浊浊的画面,缓而停顿的音乐,男子圆圆镜框后面的迷惑和犹豫,以及一种莫名其妙的哭笑不得,完全不懂那种纠结在一起的是怅然的痛苦还是一种极端的喜.但那张脸确实幻化似一团被揉皱的报纸.
  “没有气味,也不会变色,就像一种原力,这种原力表面上无法看见..但却真实地存在..潜伏在原除状态…伺机脱壳而出.
   看似正常的环境隐匿着无数虚幻的影像,血腥,恶心. 幻觉,亦或真实.还是一种内心的一种难自醒.如此执迷不悟.虫侵,虫虐,自我侵略难以自拔.
  ‘I seem to be addicted to something that doesn’t really exist.I have embarked upon withdrawl and I am very fearful of what the withdraw symptoms will be.’
   眼镜上映着他快速打字苍白的手.
  一切都是虚幻,无人能抵达真实之境.
  Amercia is not a young land ,it is old ,dirty ,evil,before the pioneers,before the Indians ,evil is here ,waiting…
  It’s always full of surprise.
  精神寄托,当对其的依靠强大到迷失自我时,寄托已经变成了逃避的借口.戒所.
  No what to do when time comes.
  All is lost.
  太晦涩的片子,搞不明白想表达的是一种精神状态还是暗射什么..像是一场回忆,又似在继续,不过在重蹈覆辙,不可理喻.
  How do we know u r a real writer. I
  have a pen for writing.
  That’s not enough.Show us,write sth..
  不过是阴谋一场..
  ….
PS 打两分实在是因为看不怎么懂，以上是在纠结的观看过程中纪录下来的，临时的状态，而且也确实很讨厌那些打字机等等的恶心样，若是想要节食减肥倒是可以把这类图片贴在随处可见的地方，保证瞬间没有食欲。。

Cult Films have limited but very special appeal. Cult films are usually strange, quirky, offbeat, eccentric, oddball, or surreal, with outrageous, weird, unique and cartoony characters or plots, and garish sets. They are often considered controversial because they step outside standard narrative and technical conventions. They can be very stylized, and they are often flawed or unusual in some striking way.

Most cult films cut across many film genres (science fiction, horror, melodrama, etc.), although some film genres are also more prone to being cultish, such as the horror or sci-fi genres. Teen comedies are also more often rated as cult films, such as Dazed and Confused (1993), and Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982), with quotable lines of dialogue, and memorable characters and scenes.

Many cult films feature or effectively showcase the performance of newcomers or other unknown talented actors/actresses. These often-obscure and cheesy films are usually made by maverick, highly individualistic film-makers with low-budget resources and little commercial marketing. And cult films are rarely, if ever, sequels, since then they would have attained mainstream appeal and widespread success. Some directors are more prone to making cult films, such as John Waters, Quentin Tarantino and David Lynch, especially early in their careers, because of their individualistic perspective and style, although they can often make a conventional 'mainstream' film too (such as David Lynch's The Straight Story (1999)).

Many cult films fared poorly at the box office when first shown, but then achieved cult-film status, developing an enduring loyalty and following among fans over time, often through word-of-mouth recommendations. Sometimes, they were revolutionary, brilliant films 'before their time' (i.e., Fantasia (1940)) and not bound by the conventions of their day.

They elicit a fiery and intense passion in devoted fans, and may cause cultists to enthusiastically champion and become devoted to these films, leading to audience participation, fan club membership, and repetitive viewings and showings. Cult films have tremendous followings with certain groups, e.g., college campuses, 'midnight movie' crowds, independent film lovers, etc. Cult movie worshippers persuasively argue with all about the merits of their choices, without regard for standard newspaper or movie reviews from critics.

There's no hard-and-fast rule or checklist to gauge what makes a cult film. A cult film is often designated as such "in the eye of the beholder" without fufilling any definition. It's often a matter of opinion. One viewer's cult film may not be judged the same by another viewer. And just because a segment of devoted viewers (pre-teen girls) repeatedly watch a film - such as Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003) - to view its star Johnny Depp, or Titanic (1997) (to see Leonardo Di Caprio), or to view the latest George Lucas Star Wars film, doesn't make a film a cult film. However, there are the most popular cult films, such as The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975) and any of the Star Trek films, that have developed cult followings with all the trappings.


One of the biggest, best-known cult films was not intended to become so popular. It was a low-budget, government 'documentary' propaganda film from the mid-30s created to dramatize the dangers of marijuana use and demon weed - Reefer Madness (1936). However, Tod Browning's grotesque Freaks (1932), was deliberately advertised as "the strangest...most startling human story ever screened," and had alternate titles including Forbidden Love, The Monster Show, and Nature's Mistakes. It used real-life dwarfs, pinheads, and other human freaks (portraying sideshow circus performers) to present a jolting story of revenge.

When first released, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000) and Almost Famous (2000) were almost instantly pronounced as cult films, but as time progressed, they didn't really fit the category. They were highly-acclaimed, award-winning films that were prominently shown in the mainstream, and it had been too early to judge them as cult films. The media often labels an unusual film as a 'cult film' when it really shouldn't. It takes time for a film to reach cult status.

Camp films are cult-type films, but they are often poorly made or ludicrous, yet still enjoyable and appreciated. Cult films follow no rules or pattern - some cult films are popular only among certain limited groups of audiences or friends.

Music-Based Cult Films:

Some cult films are music-based, such as director Rob Reiner's This is Spinal Tap (1984), a tongue-in-cheek spoof of rock documentaries, following a faux British heavy metal band's disastrous US tour; Pink Floyd: The Wall (1982), a bizarre film based on the popular rock album; Ken Russell's Tommy (1975), the Who's rock opera about a deaf, dumb, and blind kid who sure plays a 'mean pinball'; and The Blues Brothers (1980), a farcical musical comedy involving two loser musicians who resurrect their old blues band.

The first of two other quintessential rock musical cult films include the transgender The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975) - notable for inspiring the craze of interactive, 'midnight movie' screenings. The iconic film was essentially a trashy tale set in a mysterious castle with kinky extraterrestrial Transylvanian transvestites, two stranded young people (including an underwear-clad Susan Sarandon), and a mad scientist. The second was a rebellious teenage musical comedy Rock 'N' Roll High School (1979) that featured a rock band named The Ramones. Perry Henzell's urban-crime drama The Harder They Come (1973) with musical star Jimmy Cliff, featured a reggae soundtrack and a seamy look at poverty and crime in Jamaica.

Well-Regarded Cult Films:

A number of cult films are well-regarded, such as Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life (1946), that became popular many years after its initial release due to repeated television showings. Likewise, the classic weeper An Affair to Remember (1957) has developed a loyal following (it was a remake of Love Affair (1939), was paid homage in Sleepless in Seattle (1993) and remade as Love Affair (1994) with Warren Beatty and Annette Bening).

Others include the science fiction classic Forbidden Planet (1956) that has developed a wide cult following, Kubrick's intriguing A Clockwork Orange (1971) - a surrealistic tale of an ultra-violent future and the danger of psychological reconditioning, or Coppola's anti-Vietnam war epic of a terrifying journey into hell in Apocalypse Now (1979), or another Kubrick classic, Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bomb (1964).

Frank Darabont's subversive, allegorical, and life-affirming prison story about two life-sentenced prisoners, The Shawshank Redemption (1994), based upon a Stephen King story, failed at the box-office during its original release, but established a strong cult following its video release. George Roy Hill, the director of such Oscar-winning hits as The Sting (1973) and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969), also helmed the comedy-drama Slap Shot (1977) with Paul Newman - noted as one of the raunchiest, most foul-mouthed, macho sports films ever made. Another highly-regarded cult film is Monte Hellman's low-budget Two-Lane Blacktop (1971) - a late 60s to early 70s entry in the road film genre - that was both an existential character study and a car-chase/race film.

A visually rich Philip-Marlowe style detective film, director Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982), set in futuristic, proto-punk Los Angeles in 2019, and about an ex-cop (Harrison Ford) who hunts down renegade human replicants, has developed a wide cultish following. An early 70s big-cult favorite was director Hal Ashby's dark, eccentric and macabre Harold and Maude (1971) about a strange taboo romance between a 20 year-old boy (Bud Cort) and a fun-loving, joie-de-vivre 79 year-old woman (Ruth Gordon) to the tune of a Cat Stevens soundtrack - with ingenious scenes of the spoiled rich boy's mock suicide attempts staged to upset his mother. A year earlier, Bud Cort had starred in Robert Altman's quirky and satirical fairy tale Brewster McCloud (1970) as a bespectacled boy living in the Houston Astrodome where he was building a machine to escape and fly away. The Sound of Music (1965) when re-released in the late 20th century was presented as a sing-along version (with subtitles) along the lines of the participatory Rocky Horror, with fans dressing up as nuns, lonely goatherds and Nazis.

Conversely, some of the most praised films have pornographic origins, such as the ground-breaking Behind the Green Door (1972) due to its star Marilyn Chambers appearing in her first adult role (she was a former All-American Girl and Ivory Snow detergent model).

             ——http://www.filmsite.org/cultfilms.html

    作为小说的《裸体午餐》是美国当代文学中很有名气的代表作品，但是我作为一般群众从来没有也没想读过它，看到wiki上的介绍就吓退了：小说由好些个松散片段组成成，作者William Burroughs说这篇作品从哪里起头阅读都可以，因为没法概括情节。在没有上下文的情况下带着严重的未知开始看电影，柯南伯格虽然难舍昆虫和alter ego情节，但是这部片和几部前作相比实在太甜了，我看完都感到意外，依稀有种《黑店狂想曲》和《爱丽丝梦游仙境》的奇幻和嘲讽气质，与此同时这部片也足够让人犯晕，电影中有杀虫子杀老婆贩毒嗑药搅基写小说当间谍情节，地点在纽约与异域风情鲜明的interzone之间穿梭，男主角在一群基佬中简直成了万人迷，还半推半就地当起了情报人员，仿佛穿越到了格林的冒险小说，主线还安排他成了一个心中一直住着自己老婆的痴情汉，一个枪法超烂的痴情汉——一种难以言表的荒诞自嘲之气喷薄而出。心想这片可真神了，虽然看得我稀里糊涂，却也饶有趣味，和之前想的完全不一样。
    没有什么血腥怪物，原著小说是能够让柯南伯格发挥他整天研究精神分析的专能的作品。作为小说的《裸体午餐》是一个松散的体系，导演没有照搬原著，而是选择一部分内容，并把作者William Burroughs创作小说的情节放进电影，等于实现了Burroughs写作的出发点，男主角Bill Lee就是他本人。1951年，时年37岁的Burroughs在与妻子Joan在墨西哥的酒吧里心血来潮玩起威廉退尔的游戏，当时的Joan安非他明成瘾，二人兴致勃勃，但是Burroughs的手枪射中妻子额头一枪毙命，当地法官判定这是事故杀人，Burroughs关押了12天并交付保释金后就重获自由了。他一生对杀妻过失深感罪责，并受此激发写出了《裸体午餐》——创作生涯中的第一部小说，他曾说没有Joan就不会有这部作品。而柯南伯格等于拍了一部半传记色彩的电影：讲述一个叫做Bill Lee的男人如何在误杀妻子之后写了一部叫做《裸体午餐》的小说，小说的创作过程也是他建构Interzone并目睹和经历和各种奇异和死亡的过程。或者可以说，按照柯南伯格的路数，这部电影讲述一个因为杀妻而变成精神病且拥有写作技巧的男人看到听到想到的各种奇幻体验，尽管这情节离奇出格地难以概括，姑且梳理个大概：
驱虫人Bill Lee的妻子Joan药物成瘾，他邂逅了一只用屁股说话的巨大甲虫（名副其实的talking asshole），得知Joan是来自北非某个叫做Interzone的间谍。
Bill从一个自称Dr Benway的男人那里买到一种巴西水生蜈蚣做成的黑色粉状药物作为解药。
回家后Bill提议和妻子玩William Tell routine然后开枪打死了Joan。
在酒吧里Bill遇到一个叫Kiki的同性恋男孩，并认识了一个长得好像苦瓜外星人的奇怪生物Mugwump，要他前往Interzone，用Clark Nova打字机写报告。
Bill在Interzone遇到用黑色蜈蚣肉做的毒品的德国人Hans。
房间里的打字机变成用屁股说话的巨大甲虫，让Bill以同性恋为掩护从事间谍活动。
Bill参加当地派对重逢Kiki，并结识来自美国的作家夫妇Tom和Joan。Tom还把自己的Martinelli打字机借给他。
晚上两台打字机都变成甲虫，Clark Nova攻击Martinelli，说它是敌方间谍，并让Bill去诱骗Joan从而摸清黑色蜈蚣肉的来龙去脉。
Bill和Joan的偷欢被女房主Fadela打断，捣毁了一台变成奇异甲虫享受二人欢愉的打字机。
Clark Nova打字机告诉BillJoan是Fadela手下的间谍，原型是只蜈蚣。
纽约的两个哥们Hank和Martin也和Bill碰面了，他们催Bill尽快完成这本叫做Naked Lunch的小说。
Bill用上了Mugwump变的打字机。
为了进一步摸清黑蜈蚣肉工厂的秘密Bill又和瑞士人Cloquet勾搭上，其间不得不牺牲了Kiki，变成虫型基佬的Cloquet品尝Kiki的那场戏堪称全片最重口的一幕（Cloquet先森你这里有看得见风景的房间吗？）
Bill用Mugwump变的打字机从Tom手里换回了被抓走的Clark Nova，并且最终来到挂满了Mugwump的黑肉车间，也就是Hans的毒品加工厂。他找到了正在帮工的Joan。Fadela现身，一扒皮是Dr.Benway。Bill以带上Joan为前提，答应Dr. Benway前往Annexia做毒品交易。出境时Bill为了向Joan证明自己的作家身份而再次玩起了“William Tell Routine”（看似毫无逻辑，但是现实中就是如此），又是一枪要了Joan性命。
Bill泪流满面，电影结束(观众也要泪流满面了，这情节确实没法概括)

    电影颇有点宿命悲观的意味，虽然主要情节关联性太差，但是似乎又确实朝着一个方向前进的，有充满异国风情的谍战情节（如果talking asshole也算的话）和血液黏液齐流人体物体异化的超现实画面，讲述一个失去妻子的零动机作家为了追查莫名的黑蜈蚣肉毒品加工厂而成为听屁股指挥的间谍，最终发现毒品工厂老巢，带上妻子远走，但是最后还是失去了心爱之人的经历（简直不能称之为故事），就好比所有理论人员所说，讲故事和钟表的“滴答”声一样，有tig就要有tag，但是很明显从原著到电影这tig和tag之间不是隔得太远就是干脆被按住压回去了，而且许多留白段落，比如Bill在Interzone参加的Party压根没演，Cloquet是如何与Billd搭讪任何起因，全靠他们的对话得知或者推测这两个人在Party上见过。
    导演的专场之一的化妆和道具特效当然也是瞩目焦点，他电影里的很多怪物甲虫的显著特点是具有能激起厌恶感的丑，Mugwump出场的时候真让人难受，但是看到齐刷刷挂在毒品工厂里的Mugwumps的时候忽然觉得它们好萌，负责视觉特效的还是以Fly拿到小金人的Chris Walas团队。电影里Bill的两个作家伙伴Hank和Martin原型据说就是凯鲁亚克和金斯堡（垮掉三巨头齐聚柯南伯格这种想想觉得奇特），我感觉里面Martin的形象和金斯堡尤其传神。

　　纳博科夫说过，一些所谓的名著，只不过是一个个巨大的石膏体，读完美国作家威廉·巴勒斯的小说《裸体午餐》之后，我实在有些迷惑，我实在无法判断它是不是那巨大的石膏体，也不知它是不是该挨几锤子。
　　
　　《在路上》（杰克·凯鲁亚克）的中文本译者王永年（他同时也是《博尔赫斯文集》的主要译者）曾经这样评价《在路上》：
　　
　　“我觉得《在路上》不能算小说，跟我以前翻译的小说很不一样，缺乏必要的结构，读起来比较乱，也没有情节，更加散文化一点。这种喷薄而出的写法倒是更像德莱塞，但德莱塞的作品是现实主义的路子，《在路上》则没有这种关怀在里面，可以说是一种‘事实主义’。它有点类似于西方报纸的特稿写作，忠实记录作家的见闻，也不讲写作技法，所以我觉得它不能算小说。”
　　
　　如果说《在路上》不能算是小说，那么《裸体午餐》更不能算是小说了。
　　
　　威廉·巴勒斯和杰克·凯鲁亚克是哥们儿，所谓“垮掉的一代”的代表，他们彼此之间的影响自然是不用说的，连他的小说的名字《裸体午餐》都出自杰克·凯鲁亚克的提议，王永年对于《在路上》的评价一样也适合《裸体午餐》，如果非要在这个评论上加一个字来形容《裸体午餐》，那只需加一个“更”字。那就是与《在路上》相比，《裸体午餐》更没有必要的结构，读起来更乱，更没有情节，更散文化一些，散得不能再散，绝对让大多数读者晕头转向。
　　
　　《在路上》虽然是一本不太象样的小说，但总还有那个几个能让人记住的主人公，虽然很乱，都总有一条算不得太清晰的线索，还有朦朦胧胧的主题，虽然不外从美国东部到西部，又从西部到东部，或者从美国到墨西哥，再从墨西哥到美国，中途不外打架、吸毒、乱交，无论如何，只要他们“在路上”，他们就有某种时代的意义或者象征，但是在《裸体午餐》里呢？什么也没有。
　　
　　在《裸体午餐》序言的最后，有这样的句子：
　　
　　“全世界服用止痛剂的孩子们联合起来，我们失去的只是贩毒者，而他们是多余的。看清楚，看清楚吸毒的路，不要贸然踏上去，结交乌合之众。”
　　
　　这样的句子，颇像李渔的《肉铺团》开篇语中的劝世良言，这给人一种假像，《裸体午餐》一定会是一本瘾君子的忏悔录吧？但马上你就知道，以其说它是一本忏悔录，不如说它是一本吸毒史、淫乱史、堕落史、犯罪史，无论算作哪种历史，在其中你绝看不到半点的悔意，有的只是冷冰冰的、不带任何感情色彩的记录。
　　
　　吸毒体验我相信对于大多数读者是陌生的，但与性相关的东西对于大多数成年人来说，虽然不能尝尽各种可能，但多多少少都会经历一些。在《裸体午餐》中淫乱场面可谓穷尽了性的各种可能，男女、男男、女女、女男、老少、少老、口交、肛交，性虐、NP等等等等，你能想到的各种情色场面细节，无一不得以呈现，怪不得有人说，既然《裸体午餐》能公然在中国出版，《金瓶梅》为什么至今仍是限制级的呢？但以此说《裸体午餐》是一本以“重口味”来媚俗或者媚雅的小说，显然是不公平的。
　　
　　虽然可以用各种“史”来称呼《裸体午餐》，但它绝对不是老老实实的卷宗，当你耐着性子读完一章，对几个人物有了模糊有印象，用纷乱的对话、场面拼凑出小说接下来的发展趋势时，这一章基本就结束了。
　　
　　在接下来的一章里，已经换了不同的人物，不同的场景，你细心地回首上一章，但你无论如何找不出它们之间的必然联系，不仅如此，你在以后的，所有章节里，也休想找到各章节之间的彼此联系来，除是偶尔几个曾经出现的人物。《裸体午餐》任何一章，你其实都可以当作一篇短篇小说来看。确实，不同的人物，在不同的章节里偶尔出现过，但你看不出，不同章节的同一个人物之间有什么逻辑发展关系。
　　
　　《裸体午餐》的各章节与其说是的小说，不如说，它们是在作者威廉·巴勒斯的牵引下读者做的一个个纷纷扰扰的梦，而你知道差不多所有的梦都是不合逻辑、千奇百怪、恐怖、锁碎、混乱，而当你醒来，那些曾经让你在其中挣扎的梦也差不多已经忘得一干二净，虽然你想细细的把它们回想一遍，疏理一遍。
　　
　　有人说，《裸体午餐》暴露的是资本主义社会腐朽、没落的生活，但我觉得，他其实揭示的只是人可能到达、堕落（无贬意）的极限，这种堕落，既是肉体上的，也是心灵上的，而性、毒品只不过是通往堕落之路的媒介，没有它们，一样会有其他的媒介。
　　
　　《裸体午餐》虽然不同于任何曾经出现的小说文本，但我相信威廉·巴勒斯决不是在有意做某种文本实验，我相信《裸体午餐》的文本之所以呈现出现在的样子，就只是因为威廉·巴勒斯自己所说：“大多数的幸存者记不清当时的迷乱状态，而我似乎对这种疾病和迷乱状态做了详细的笔记。”
　　
　　而《裸体午餐》何以写得如此的“乱“，其实威廉·巴勒斯自己已经解释得很清楚了：
　　
　　“你可以在任意一个交叉口切入《裸体午餐》……作家所能撰写的只有写作时他意识里的东西……，我不想刻意编造‘故事’、‘情节’、‘连贯性’……，我在成功地直接记录精神活动的某些领域的同时也会存在不足……，我不是一个给别人提供消遣的人⋯⋯”